Cost Of Vinyl Shakes Vs Vinyl Siding

Let s talk about vinyl siding cost plain and simple it s less expensive to have faux cedar shake siding installed than cedar shingles.

Cost of vinyl shakes vs vinyl siding.

Vinyl siding is nearly always less expensive than fiber cement siding. While vinyl shake siding is more expensive that a typical lap vinyl siding 6 35 vs 4 79 per square foot it offers a durable beautiful alternative to real wood shakes at a mere fraction of the cost. Expect to pay between 13 000 and 25 000 for a job. Thus changing a house color is not really an option with vinyl siding.

If you re covering 1 000sf that 3 per square foot difference can quickly add up. Vinyl siding will cost between 6 50 and 12 50 per sq. Vinyl siding is far cheaper than the fiber cement siding both in terms of the product and labor costs. Vinyl also comes in numerous colors and textures but painting it later can be problematic.

Insulated vinyl siding will cost more than non insulated siding. I looked at foundry vinyl shakes and there was no comparison. There are no added expenses such as primer sealant or paint. The house is 5200 sq ft.

Vinyl shake siding costs. As a comparison the cost was 5 000 more than smartside. It has a bit of variation in the color like real cedar shakes and it has some depth to the color and texture. On average budget closer to 4 to 6 per square foot installed.

How much does vinyl siding cost. High end vinyl siding can be expensive but quality vinyl usually costs less than 2 per square foot. The maximum you can expect to pay for vinyl siding is the minimum you can expect to pay for hardieplank and other fiber cement. Vinyl siding is considerably less expensive than wood.

To install or around 650 to 1 250 per square 100 sq ft. The thicker the vinyl the more durable and expensive it is. Some may charge 2 per square foot while others may charge 5 per square foot. Vinyl contractors charge different amounts per project.

One rough rule of thumb. Depending on the grade of the cedar expect 5 or more per foot. In fact it s not even close.